
by APTN
Published: Tue, February 10, 2009 - 6:19 am CST
Last Updated: Tue, February 10, 2009 - 6:26 am CST
Authorities searching for answers to the carnage from Australia's worst-ever wildfires said on Tuesday they would rethink current policies of allowing residents to decide for themselves whether to evacuate their homes.Officials defended their preparation and actions during last weekend's unprecedented infernos that swept unchecked across southeastern Australia and killed 173 people, and said forced expulsions probably would not have prevented all of the deaths.
Disaster teams moving into towns burned out the inferno found charred bodies on roadsides and in crashed cars, grim signs of futile attempts to flee raging wildfires fed by 60 mph (100 kph) winds, record heat and drought.
Suspicions that some of the 400 blazes were caused by arson has led police to declare crime scenes in some incinerated towns.
The fires near Melbourne, a southern city of some 4 (m) million people that is Australia's second-largest, destroyed more than 750 homes, left 5,000 people homeless, and burned 1,100 square miles (2,850 square kilometres) of land, the Victoria Country Fire Service said.
Three days after the worst single day of wildfires in Australia's history, officials said their ferocity, pace and breadth made them impossible to fight effectively.
Still, this disaster would likely rewrite the books on what is considered best practice for handling fires, including the widespread policy of allowing residents in high-risk areas to decide for themselves whether to stay or flee.
The policy recognises that Australia's wildfire services, made up largely of volunteers, lack the resources to protect every house; thus, homeowners are allowed to try to protect their own property.
"It is the application of that policy and a lack of an alternative that we need to work on," Country Fire Authority chief Russel Rees told reporters on Tuesday. But he conceded that evacuation orders were unlikely to be heeded by all, and would be hard to enforce during a fire emergency.
John Brumby, Victoria State Premier said on Tuesday that no stone would be left unturned "whether it's fire readiness, whether it's climate, whether it's planning policy, whether it's government policy, whatever it is."
"We'll have the highest level inquiry so that we can learn the lessons from what occurred at the weekend and make sure that an event like this never happens again," he said.
The scale of the disaster shocked a nation that endures deadly firestorms every few years. Officials said panic and the freight-train speed of the walls of flames probably accounted for the unusually high death toll.
Firefighters on Tuesday were still battling more than a dozen blazes that burned out of control across Victoria state, although conditions were much cooler than Saturday.
Forecasters said temperatures would rise later this week, posing a risk of flare-ups.
Blazes have been burning for weeks across several states in southern Australia, common for time of year. But the worst drought in a century in the south had left forests extra dry, and Saturday's temperature was 117 degrees (47 Celsius), the relative humidity was 7 percent, and the wind
was gusting to 50 mph (80 kph).
President Barack Obama telephoned Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd on Monday night to convey his condolences to the victims. Obama offered U.S. Assistance to help with the fires.
Survivors gathered at emergency relief centres looking for loved ones and accepting much needed handouts of food and clothes.
Welfare groups also began taking in injured animals.
Victoria Police Commissioner Christine Nixon said investigators had evidence that one of the deadly blazes, known as the Churchill fire after a ruined town east of Melbourne, was arson, and it could not be ruled out for others.
A task force of 100 officers was being established for what would be a long and complex investigation, she said.
Of Australia's estimated 60,000 fires in forests and other vegetation each year, about half are deliberately lit or are suspicious, the government-funded Institute of Criminology said earlier this month.
In New South Wales State on Monday, a 31-year-old man appeared in court charged with arson in connection with a weekend wildfire north of Sydney. No loss of life was reported there, and he faces up to 10 years in prison.
Police said towns where bodies were still laying in the open or where they believed evidence of crimes may lie would remain sealed off.
Devastating Aussie Fires May Be Arson










Recently Commented On
Alabama Ethics Commission Found…
Toddler Shot In Apparent Drive-by…
Customers Chase After Bank Robber
Revenue Commission Missing 20k
Jaguars Ground Falcons