CIA Threatened To Kill Suspect’s Children

Cia Detainee  Report Sheds New Light on Interrogations; One Questioner Allegedly Told Detainee His Mother Would Be Sexually Assaulted..
by CBS/AP
Published: Mon, August 24, 2009 - 2:20 pm CST Last Updated: Mon, August 24, 2009 - 2:23 pm CST
(CBS/AP) A newly declassified CIA report says interrogators threatened to kill the children of a Sept. 11 suspect.

The document, released Monday by the Justice Department, says one interrogator said a colleague had told Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that if any other attacks happened in the United States, "We're going to kill your children."

Another interrogator allegedly tried to convince a different terror suspect detainee that his mother would be sexually assaulted in front of him - though the interrogator in question denied making such a threat.

The report, written in 2004, examined CIA treatment of terror detainees following the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. It has been declassified as part of a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union.

Meanwhile, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. named John Durham, a Justice Department prosecutor, to investigate whether interrogators may have broken any laws by threatening terror suspects.

"I don’t think that the attorney general had much choice, politically anyway, but to take this step and launch this criminal investigation," writes CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. "And even the CIA itself acknowledges that some of its agents, current and former, went beyond legal limits in interrogation. The question is whether crimes were committed and can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt."

This is just an initial step," Cohen adds. "Just because there is now a prosecutor doesn’t guarantee we’ll see any CIA trials and certainly doesn’t ensure any convictions. All of the problems that existed before - problems with classified information and inadmissible evidence - still remain."

Earlier Monday, a top administration official said President Barack Obama had approved a new, special terrorism-era interrogation unit to be supervised by the White House - a departure from President George W. Bush's detainee policies.
Email a Friend Email to a Friend   
Printer Friendly Printer Friendly
Translate: » Spanish | French | German | Italian | Japanese | Chinese | Russian | Hindi

Do you mean the “kids” who were already in custody for acts of terrorism? And what worse atrocities have been belied on the US and our allies by these terrorists? You cannot send them to time-out and expect them to do better, or bow to their kings and expect their gratitude. Obama IS changing things-indebting us for generations to come, jepordizing our national security, and making us the laughing stock of the world-in just 6 short months,no less!

Maybe they did actually have the mother raped and the kids killed. There is a video of kids being raped at abu ghraib prison under US command at the time, because their parents wouldn’t or couldn’t give up info.

jeffsmith asks

...I guess a more appropriate question would be, if the neighbor’s kid, strapped what looked like a explosive device, would you shoot them before they crossed into your yard?


The short answer is “in a NY second.”

The media does “hype” it. The reports have been on the table since 2004, and now THIS administration is deciding to pursue an investigation and possible charges? Didn’t this same president during his campaign state that what was in the past was in the past? Hmmm-another lie? How is it our military’s fault if children are killed because terrorist CHOOSE to put themselves amongst the kids? Did the terrorists care about protecting the children, or using it as propaganda, after the fact. These people are ruthless. They take pregnant women and the mentally disabled,strapped with explosives to kill and maim as many as possible (because they will look “innocent”). The current methods have kept us safe for almost 8 years now. The new administration has just extended an invitation for more terror on OUR soil. Heck, they’ll probably even have a guest suite and a “teachable” moment over beer.

Threatening kids,or to rape someones mother-was just that, a “threat”-to get them to spill secrets,which worked. They did not act on it. Unlike the terrorists who decapitate someone on live TV, or kill their OWN children.

jmorganal

I guess a more appropriate question would be, if the neighbor’s kid, strapped what looked like a explosive device, would you shoot them before they crossed into your yard?

claycitymadness:

your statement typifies the benjamin franklin quote: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

JeffSmith wrote:
....here’s a question, if the neighbor’s kids had swine flu and attempted to cross into your yard, would you shoot them to protect your own children from the potential threat of the sometimes deadly disease? And what would you do if your neighbor shot your kids in the same scenario?

A more appropriate question would be, if the neighbor’s kid, strapped with an explosive device, tried to enter your house, what would you do?  No attempt to save your kids, your family?  Once again, I do not understand this mentality.

This is not about hyped media. This report is just a small ray of light from a highly redacted document. Meanwhile the boys are still having fun with their predator drones (the name reminds me of the term child predator) in safety with a pat on the shoulder for saving the world.


Obama has changed nothing

i still dont have a problem with the cia. if it takes them having access to my telephone records fine. listen in on my calls? are you kidding, go right ahead you wil discover just how boring life has become. yeah maybe i did look at youporn for four hours on a saturday once but so what. i know we have lost pretty much any expectation of privacy. but if its what it takes to keep the nuts from doing crazy stuff go ahead. nothing really to hide here. (Except looking at youporn once and a while)

jeffsmith. You are paying to much attention to what the media is feeding you. The media is in business to make money and the best way for them to do that is to sensationalize any and everything to sell the so called news. While there may be innocent children dying one has to remember that this is a war and there will be collateral damage. The media will hype anything to make it sell.

Recently Commented On

Recession Hits Food Network…

3 Total Comments
Recession Hits Food Network Hard Mississippi Food Network will not be able to distribute… more »

Driver Loses Control Hitting…

4 Total Comments
Driver Loses Control Hitting 10 People Police are questioning a driver in Fairfield, Alabama, after… more »

Throng Shows Up In Birmingham…

1 Total Comments
Throng Shows Up In Birmingham For Palin Hundreds Have Lined Up At A Birmingha-area Book Store In… more »

Fire Destroys Abandoned House

11 Total Comments
Fire Destroys Abandoned House An empty, single story house was destroyed Friday morning… more »

Reading Proves Difficult For…

10 Total Comments
Reading Proves Difficult For AL Students Analysis of the Alabama High School Grad Exam shows that… more »