Congressman Dicks Confident Boeing Will Win

.

M30o93H7pQ09L8X1t49cHY01Z5j4TT91fGfr Congressman Dicks Confident Boeing Will Win
Published: Thu, March 13, 2008 - 11:02 pm
A Washington State Congressman says he believes Boeing deserved the Air Force tanker contact. Norm Dicks spoke out on national television Thursday night. He was a guest on Lou Dobb's show on CNN.
Read the show's transcript below or watch the interview by clicking play.

Transcript from CNN

DOBBS: Well, outrage on Capitol Hill over the outsourcing of that $35 billion contract to a European company that builds airbus.
Congressman Norm Dicks says the Air Force's decision is simply flawed. He's fighting that decision with everything he's got in his power.
Joining us live from Capitol Hill, Congressman, good to have you here. Are you going to prevail?

REP. NORM DICKS (D), WASHINGTON: Yes, Lou, I think we are going to prevail. I think because the Air Force told Congress that it wanted a medium-sized tanker, testimony by Secretary Mike Wynne, and because they even gave us documents as late as December, which indicated that they were going to buy a medium-sized tanker, rather than a large tanker, I feel they've misled the Congress. I think we have every right to stop this program.

DOBBS: Well, Boeing has never protested one of these contracts before. But I mean, that's a pretty major screw up to throw the Air Force to say, well, we will just take the big one instead of the medium one like we've been telling you all. How in the world did the - Secretary Wynne explained that one?

DICKS: Well, he had no explanation. He said because it's under protest, we just - he said we followed the regulations. We were open and transparent. They weren't open and transparent. The reality is they changed the criteria for this competition and made some changes after Northrop Grumman threatened to pull out of the competition that made it possible for the A330 to compete.

DOBBS: The airbus. DICKS: Now -- yes, the airbus. This is a subsidized airplane. The A330 and the A340 were built together -- and they received $5 billion in launch aid and that wasn't even considered.

DOBBS: Well -- there's not only subsidized, we have -- the United States has an action before the World Trade Organization as you well know...

DICKS: Right.

DOBBS: ...bringing forward those subsidy charges. How -- and I heard Secretary Wynne say, well, you know, they're confident they stayed within the law. What kind of moronic process do we have that permits this kind of thing? I don't care whether it's within the law or not, it's -- it lacks basic judgment, it lacks a strategic sense, it lacks any kind of maturity of reason. What in the world is the federal government doing here?

DICKS: Well, I think what they've done, we've passed the laws over the years, and they apply to the United States competitor, in this case, Boeing, but they don't apply to Airbus.

DOBBS: Right.

DICKS: I mean -- and so they -- we have created a monster that's got to be changed. The last three major contracts all went to foreign companies. And I'm really worried. Now here's the other thing I'm worried about, Lou. How do we bring parts, a tail from Spain, the fuselage from Britain...

DOBBS: Right. Then assemble it like an erector set in Mobile, Alabama.

DICKS: Right. And then put it together in a plant that doesn't exist with a crew that doesn't exist. Northrop Grumman tried to do (INAUDIBLE) down in Louisiana and it was a complete flop.

DOBBS: Right. But you know, the folks down in Mobile, Alabama, Northrop Grumman is saying, you know what? You may give it ultimately after this 100-day review by the GAO, you may give it to Boeing but Boeing just going outsource 60 percent of it to China.

DICKS: Wait. I'm told, and this is what they have told us from the start on this particular plane, Lou, it's the A-767. It's 85 percent American.

DOBBS: Right.

DICKS: Built in this country. That's pretty good in this global market that we're competing in.

DOBBS: Yes. And it's about time we started getting our heads on straight about what constitutes national defense and whether or not that's going to be important to this country in the years ahead. We hope so.

DICKS: And Lou...

DOBBS: Norm Dicks, we thank you. I'm sorry, go ahead.

DICKS: Can I say one final thing? They didn't look at industrial base, they didn't look at national security. They didn't look at any of these major issues including subsidy, we got to start over.

DOBBS: Yes, to do all of that, of course, we've got to have some leadership. And...

DICKS: Some judgment, as you said.

DOBBS: You got it.

Congressman Norm Dicks, good to have you here.

DICKS: Thank you, Lou.

DOBBS: And good luck.

I wonder what Dicks will say when Boeing moves as much of its plant to Mexico City as it can.  I bet old Dicks will retire then.  By the Way yes Boeing has purchased real estate in Mexico City and have started construction there. 

So is Boeing going to start putting made in Mexico on all of their planes?

Posted by asda on 03/14/08 - 3:37 pm • Report Abuse.   

Is Dicks negotiating high paying jobs for all his relatives over the next 3 generations?

Methinks the man doth protest too much.......

Posted by BamaBob on 03/14/08 - 1:26 pm • Report Abuse.   

the contract should not be renegotiated it was bid on and eads air bus and northrop grumman won boeing had their chance and lost

Posted by rosepetal on 03/14/08 - 12:01 pm • Report Abuse.   

Boeing lobby expenditures in 2007 thus far total $4.14 million.[21] In 2006, total of $9.12 million was spent. Boeing is one of four major corporations which, after September 11, 2001, were accused[attribution needed] of pushing for “Star Wars” missile defense.[22][verification needed] These corporations had been making “a major political investment,” and receiving 60 percent of government missile defense contracts.[22]

[edit] source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing ... pretty sure you can find the same kind of info on Northrup this may also explain why so many congressmen are favoring Boeing ... same ol same ol.. if you want o know whats really going on… ‘follow the money’

Posted by primate502002 on 03/14/08 - 9:39 am • Report Abuse.   

Boeing lobby expenditures in 2007 thus far total $4.14 million.[21] In 2006, total of $9.12 million was spent. Boeing is one of four major corporations which, after September 11, 2001, were accused[attribution needed] of pushing for “Star Wars” missile defense.[22][verification needed] These corporations had been making “a major political investment,” and receiving 60 percent of government missile defense contracts…

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing ... read the whole article starting from the year 2000 on down… wonders how deep Dicks is into Boeing’s pockets?

Posted by primate502002 on 03/14/08 - 9:32 am • Report Abuse.   

before you stick your neck too far out defending Boeing.. ya need to visit this site and read a little of Boeing’s more recent history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing ... especially the Unethical Conduct and the industrial espionage convictions that pertain directly to this contract it’s just below the year 2000’s history ..

Posted by primate502002 on 03/14/08 - 8:50 am • Report Abuse.   

“Boeing could have made the decision easier by designing the plane which the Air Force brass wanted in the first place rather than dictating to the military what they had to make do with.”

Posted by BamaBob on 03/14/08 - 8:31 am • Report Abuse.   

That statement made by Todd Tiahrt bothered me too, but I would like to see more evidence supporting his claims.  At this time Airbus has been struggling with labor problems in France due to strong unions.  Also, the Euro is much stronger than the dollar, which would be a strong motivation for European investors to use the American workforce in order to ensure maximum profitability.

Also, EADS has already opened an engineering facility at Brookley, which should allow them ample lead time before manufacturing ever begins.

There is also a long-term goal within this tanker deal that has to be considered.  NG plans to invest large amounts of money in Brookley with hopes of securing the rest of the tanker project over the years and also become a more competitive provider in all areas of the aeronautical industry.

Posted by BamaBob on 03/14/08 - 8:27 am • Report Abuse.   

if you watched the hearings on this by the review board..one thing that sticks out in my mind was the fact that was brought out ..that EADS bid a contract like this before… to build a plant/plane and all.. then after they got the contract..they said.. oh.. well… if we wait till the plant is built and the personnel are trained it will put us too far behind..so we’ll just build it here in France..where we already have the assembly line and trained personnel.... if this contract is renegotiated.. i would like to see some ‘ironclad’ guarantees that this plane/plant will indeed be built in mobile..or we’re gonna have an awful lot of people/politicians with egg on their faces and left holding a very smelly bag of promises…

Posted by primate502002 on 03/14/08 - 7:53 am • Report Abuse.   

Why doesn’t the media ever have a neutral type person on that can explain what is really going on with this tanker deal?

Lou Dobbs is a former Seattle news anchor and Dicks is the “congressman from Boeing.” If they were honest about this deal, everyone would be floored.

Posted by BamaBob on 03/14/08 - 6:00 am • Report Abuse.   


What's on Your Mind

Get Breaking News Sent to Your e-mail.


WKRG.com © 2008 Media General Communications Holdings, LLC. A Media General company.
Terms & ConditionsContact InformationEmploymentInternshipsOpen RatingsAdvertise With Us
FFC-EEO Report Children's Programming FCC Form 388 Public File