Boeing Dropping Out Of Tanker Battle?

By Reuters
.

Boeing is "strongly considering" not bidding on the $40 billion tanker contract. Some of its backers in Congress argue the revised terms of the competition, issued by the Pentagon last week, favor Northrop Grumman Corp and EADS. Boeing Dropping Out Of Tanker Battle?
Published: Mon, August 11, 2008 - 11:09 am
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Boeing Co is "strongly considering" not bidding on the upcoming competition for a $40 billion U.S. Air Force refueling tanker contract, Aviation Week, the aerospace industry magazine, reported on Monday, without identifying its sources.

The No. 2 Pentagon contractor has not commented on the issue publicly, but some of its backers in Congress have argued that the revised terms of the competition, issued by the Pentagon last week, favor Northrop Grumman Corp and its European partner EADS.

Boeing officials are "strongly considering the option of not submitting a proposal," according to the report on the magazine's website, citing "multiple sources familiar with Boeing's internal discussions."

Boeing declined comment on the report, saying that it had responded to the initial request for proposal and was set to meet Pentagon official on Tuesday to discuss it. Any decision on the competition before that would be "premature", said Boeing spokesman Dan Beck.

The company's shares were down 1.8 percent at $66.61 on the New York Stock Exchange.

The Pentagon last week reopened the tanker contract contest with a draft version of its requirements, and will spend the next week or so discussing the criteria with bidders. A final request for proposal is expected in mid-August, with a deadline of Oct. 1 for submission of bids.

The prospect of having only one bidder for the contract would be embarrassing for the Air Force and the Pentagon, which have gone out of their way to demonstrate that the competition is open and fair.

The Northrop/EADS team won the contest in February, but government auditors subsequently found errors in the way the competition was run. Prior to the competition, the Northrop/EADS team also vacillated about entering the competition, raising questions about fairness.

Last week, Boeing backers bristled at the terms and timetable of the Pentagon's new tanker competition.

The new criteria "appear to favor a tanker larger than any real-world scenarios would require", said Rep. Norm Dicks, a Washington state Democrat and Boeing backer last week, implying that it would favor the larger plane offered by Northrop/EADS.

Sen. Patty Murray, another Washington state Democrat, said the new documents raised some "red flags," and the timetable for new submissions was "simply unrealistic."

Boeing, which has traditionally built tankers for the U.S. Air Force, had a deal to supply a new fleet of tankers but the arrangement was scrapped in 2004 after it came to light that Boeing offered a job to a top Air Force procurement officer.

Translate: » Spanish | French | German | Italian | Japanese | Chinese | Russian | Hindi

The KC-45 aircraft won based upon merits!
. The GAO pointed out some procedural issues they had with the RFP, but emphatically said those had nothing to do with the technical merits of the chosen aircraft!

Report Abuse

“NG already won the contract based upon the merits of the aircraft.”

That is simply not true and will never be known for sure since the Air Force FAILED to judge the two according to their own rules and criteria set forth in the RFP.  EADS/NG won due to a comedy of errors committed by the Air Force’s selection committee.  The GAO report that upheld Boeing’s protest proves that.

Report Abuse

Link to the LA Times editorial?  I suspect this is one of several retired Generals on Northrup’s payroll!  I would expect them to sing the praises of their employers.

The Seattle Post is no more ‘biased’ then the dredge al.com spits out on a regular basis.  LOL!

Report Abuse

NG already won the contract based upon the merits of the aircraft.  Boeing has nothing better to offer at this time, so they should pull out of the competition.

Report Abuse

a editoral from the los angeles times reveals the real boeing.  While I can’t predict the outcome of this next round in the tanker war, I can predict that the period leading up to a new tanker decision will be filled with misinformation. And, if recent history is an indicator, the folks on Boeing’s side of the aisle will generate most of that misinformation.

In my 36-year Air Force career and in my subsequent retirement, I have never before seen a military contractor that is so hell-bent on telling the Air Force and the world that the company and not the Air Force knows what the Air Force needs and wants. Soon we will see more of that.

Report Abuse

michaelc,Seattle Post-Intelligencer 08/12/2008
>>>>>>>>>no bias there lol

Report Abuse

I believe you mean ‘can be screwed out of’ the tanker contract.  Sounds like Boeing is pulling a play from the EADS/NG play book here.  Threaten to not bid if changes aren’t made to the RFP.  Obviously it worked pretty well for them.  Pretty smart move if you ask me!

Northrop has effectively used this no-bid threat before.

Last year, Northrop said it would not bid on the tankers if the requirements favored the smaller 767. At the time, Northrop, with the help of Sen. John McCain, already had gotten the Air Force to drop language in a draft request for proposals that would have given consideration to a dispute between the U.S. and the European Union over Airbus subsidies.

After Northrop threatened not to bid on the tankers, the Air Force made changes in its final request for proposals that Boeing and its supporters in Congress have argued “kept Northrop in the game.”

Seattle Post-Intelligencer   08/12/2008
Author: James Wallace
(Copyright 2008)

Report Abuse

wait and see michaelc, i really believe boeing can not steal this tanker contract.

Report Abuse

Don’t go counting your tankers before they’re hatched!

http://blog.al.com/live/2008/08/boeing_says_no_plans_to_drop_a.html

Report Abuse

All along, I was told by people who are at the top of the major companies that the dispute was just for show. They both said that Northrop and EADS would get the contract in the end. It looks like they were right.

Report Abuse

Recent Commented: News Reports

Azalea Trail Maids Remind NAACP…

12 Total Comments
Azalea Trail Maids Remind NAACP Of Slavery Alabama NAACP President Edward Vaughn thinks they were a… more »

‘Missing’ Cop Stole…

7 Total Comments
‘Missing’ Cop Stole $70,000 In Drug Money Sgt. Faron White is now accused of taking $70,000 from a… more »

Roasting The Moon Pie

48 Total Comments
Roasting The Moon Pie The morning after the 9,000 dollar moon pie lifted into… more »

The End Is Near In The Natalaee…

6 Total Comments
The End Is Near In The Natalaee Holloway Case Aruban prosecutors say their investigation into the 2005… more »

Senior Bowl Superstar Contestant…

3 Total Comments
Senior Bowl Superstar Contestant Phyllis Ritchie The Mobile mother of 5 hopes to be picked to sing the National… more »

Amazon Says 2008 Holiday Season…

5 Total Comments
Amazon Says 2008 Holiday Season Was ‘best ever’ A rare piece of good news in a season that has been far… more »

 


Contact Information   •   Internships   •   Open Ratings   •   Advertise With Us
FCC-EEO Report   •   Children's Programming   •   Public File