Tanker Letter To President

Font Size By Tiffany Craig Special Assignment Reporter
.

M30o93H7pQ09L8X1t49cHY01Z5j4TT91fGfr Tanker Letter To President
Published: Tue, March 18, 2008 - 6:50 pm
Last Updated: Wed, March 19, 2008 - 11:58 am
Tiffany Craig
Tiffany Craig
One of Mobile's biggest economic projects has a lot of leaders in Congress hot under the collar!

Outspoken Kansas Representative Todd Tiahrt sent a harsh letter to President Bush.

Click here to read the letter.

You'll notice that 44 other members of Congress signed the letter too.

So, Tiffany Craig got on the phone and called the office of each politician.

We left a lot of messages and ended up with a few statements.

Jeff Giertz responded for Iowa Congressman Bruce Braley. "Well basically we feel like American defense and tax dollars should stay here in the United States. I know there's a French consortium that's part of the Northrop deal. There are some suppliers in our district in Iowa that would be positively impacted if the contract was awarded the other way and that's another factor in that decision."

Brian Robinson spoke on behalf of Georgia Congressman Lynn Westmoreland. "We are not standing out of the White House gate shaking our fists and screaming. We're just saying this is a legitimate issue being brought forth by Boeing and by some other members of Congress. We do have a duty to hold the administration accountable on these sorts of decisions."

Rebecca Black sent a statement from Kansas Rep. Dennis Moore. "I have joined my colleagues in the Kansas delegation in sending letters to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and President Bush expressing our disappointment with the decision of the Air Force and encouraging them to share the reasons behind their decision with Boeing and other interested parties as soon as possible."

Patrick Creighton sent this on behalf of Pennsylvania Congressman John E. Peterson. “It's reprehensible to believe that this ill-fated deal will not put our national security at risk. This contract, which pits a publicly held American company up against a foreign-owned company, which is backed by foreign governmental support, is simply not fair. I stand by my original statement. An American tanker should be built by an American company who employ American workers. We can not afford to outsource our national security."

The White House confirmed that they have received the letter but won't tell us if President Bush has read it. We were told that they are not the agency to answer tanker questions and directed us to the Pentagon.

Boeing is doing its best to give the American public a snow job!

Instead of calling their foreign investments partners or subsidiaries, they call them sub-contractors.  They “farm” out more and more of their workload to foreign entities in an effort to get away from strong American unions and pay rock bottom wages.

Instead of governmental subsidies, they threaten to close factories in order to receive huge tax breaks and even have employment laws re-written in order to minimize liabilities and expenditures.

If Boeing wants to make this contract a political issue with the use of scare tactics, then Northrop and Alabama needs to do a better job of getting the truth out to the general populace!!!!!!!!

Posted by BamaBob on 03/19/08 - 6:29 pm • Report Abuse   

Boeing is China ‘s largest commercial aviation partner. Over the next 20 years, Boeing forecasts that China will need 2,300 jetliners, becoming one of the world’s largest airplane markets. Boeing has offered free training to more than 27,000 Chinese aviation professionals since 1993 including pilots, maintenance, flight operations, quality and manufacturing personnel, executives and managers.

gee thanks boeing now you want to talk about national security oh i found this on boeings website just google boeing chinese not hard to find and the sad part is they are proud of this

Posted by rosepetal on 03/19/08 - 6:05 pm • Report Abuse   

“This issue of subcontracting work was highlighted by a front-page article appearing the day of the rally in the combined Seattle Times/Seattle Post Intelligencer, entitled “When Jobs Go South.” The article compared the lives of Vickie, whose job at Boeing’s Auburn plant sewing and cutting insulation blankets is scheduled to be eliminated; and a Mexican worker, María, doing exactly the same job for a Boeing subcontractor in Mexicali, Mexico. Vickie makes $18 an hour while María earns $6.10 a day. “It is not enough to live well,” María says. According to the article, Boeing will save about $50 million by shifting the work to other plants.

On the picket line at the Everett plant Bud Adams, who has worked at Boeing for 17 years, said, “It doesn’t make me proud that Boeing is paying people $6 a day in Mexico. I don’t blame Mexican workers, they are just trying to make a living. I blame the company.”

http://www.themilitant.com/1995/5944/5944_1.html

Posted by BamaBob on 03/19/08 - 4:53 pm • Report Abuse   

ulriche - You seem to label everyone bamabob on this web site, so I don’t know if you are really addressing me.  If you are, I am not clear about your snide comments.  What is it that you need a link to?

Outsourcing?

Boeing, the U.S. aircraft manufacturer, is considering opening an assembly plant in Mexico. Boeing is currently negotiating with Cintra, the holding company for Aeroméxico and Mexicana, to supply the two airlines with 157 new aircraft, at a total cost of around 6.5. billion dollars. If a contract for upgrading the fleets is finalized, then having an assembly plant in Mexico would enable Boeing to supply the new craft more quickly as well as taking the company one step closer to future contracts elsewhere in Latin America.

http://www.mexconnect.com/MEX/lloyds/llydeco0999.html

Posted by BamaBob on 03/19/08 - 4:29 pm • Report Abuse   

BamaBob, ever thought about writing children books, because not everyone can make this kind of stuff up. When making accusations, make a link available for this information. Because when you do I can read the whole thing and not read just what you want me to read. LOL Hey look at this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPmDl6HDFU8&eurl=http://www.iam751.org/

Posted by ulriche on 03/19/08 - 3:32 pm • Report Abuse   

well france booted the anti american leader and elected a pro american leader so i guess it took people to elect him right and as for boeing they lost and let me remind you the governor of washington state was in france to promote more buss to come to washington state who rebuilt the uss cole something about northrop grumman comes to mind no its not about greed unless you are talking about boeing taking money that could go to build a better tanker to create more union jobs and less aircraft Hu tours Boeing plant, meets workers

wow but wait what about national security letting the chinese leader tour boeing boeing owns washington state

I want to thank the Washington State China Relations Council for your tireless efforts over the years in advocating vibrant trade with China, elevating China trade awareness, and helping Washington businesses. Your efforts make a big difference to our state. Keep up the good work!

Posted by rosepetal on 03/19/08 - 9:52 am • Report Abuse   

In this war of words how deep does the thought processes go. EADS is the prime contractor. They kicked the U.S. Milatary out of their country in the sixties and has failed to support us in any endevor since. A prime peice of milatary equipment, critical to our defense in the hand of a foreign power. Do we go to Russia or China for our Jet Fighters next. Buying parts from a foriegn country does not rise to the level of foriegn made. I have live all my life in this area and love it dearly. It is time to put our country ahead of our selfish want and needs. Don’t through the baby out with the bath water. With respect to Boeing, fix the problem. This is the only U.S. Comjpany capable of building this air craft. In the sixties we had several until with the milatart contracts, we ran them out of business.  Think PEOPLE!

Posted by tessera on 03/19/08 - 9:02 am • Report Abuse   

Why won’t someone ask the hard question about Rep. Tiahrt? He worked for Boeing for 14 years… On him own congressional website it says “Before his service in Congress, he was employed by the Boeing Company in Wichita for nearly 14 years, where he worked on various aerospace projects including the Space Station, Air Force One and the Comanche Helicopter. (http://www.house.gov/tiahrt/about_todd.htm).

call him out on it… let him know that we know what its all about. Maybe when he is seen as a pariah, others in congress will stay away from him. He’s not serving the voters… only his relationship with Boeing and its money.

Posted by seadog on 03/19/08 - 8:43 am • Report Abuse   

231 Democrat
198 Republican
0 Independent
Total voting members: 429
5 Other
6 Vacant

Posted by rosepetal on 03/18/08 - 6:51 pm • Report Abuse   

So, Northrop Grumman means noting to these people?  Is it not a publicly traded company?

Do they ignore the facts that Boeing uses big suppliers in Italy and Japan among others?  Does it not bother them that Boeing is trying to escape union labor by moving to Mexico?

Somehow the truth about Boeing needs to be put out for the general public that goes beyond the Alabama state lines!!!!!!

Posted by BamaBob on 03/18/08 - 6:30 pm • Report Abuse   


What's on Your Mind


WKRG.com © 2008 Media General Communications Holdings, LLC. A Media General company.
Terms & ConditionsContact InformationEmploymentInternshipsOpen RatingsAdvertise With Us
FFC-EEO Report Children's Programming FCC Form 388 Public File



Advertisement