By Kimberly Curth Weekend Anchor / Reporter
who is responsible for our children?...... no one is yet to be able to tell me as a parent… or a grandparent.
I think everyone is ready for it to be over and to know the truth. Sorry if it sounded like I was attacking your statement, that was not my intent. I am assuming your cousin was older that 6 or 7. I of course don’t know the circumstances and can only wonder how they deemed something a molestation with clothes on, unless there was a physical contact of some sort under the clothes? When I make the comment a molestation cannot be made with clothes on, I am not referring to the above scenario. I mean, that if a child said “you touch mine” or whatever, and yes, they put their hand in that area, on top of the clothes, I don’t see how that can be a molestation or act of sex abuse as it was also referred to. Especially when you look at the ages involved. Of course that is my opinion, and the only way we find out the truth, is if a THOROUGH follow up is done.
I know these other children and their families would like this to be over and the truth be known.
rmseek1234, I was just commenting on your response.....
So why aren’t the parents of the girl raising a ruckus? Maybe, another fairy tale?
that i didnt think iknow was saying there was another child. My cousin went to prison for “molestating with his victims clothes on and off. In that court it was called molestation with the clothes off and on. That was in a Montgomery County court.
sjcmom365,
Well our perception of what iknowthetruth was saying is different. As is my perception of this story and these allegations, and what some others may think. No matter if it were a situation of all boys, boy/girl, or all girls for that matter, I would still say look at the developmental stages and all the factors involved. IF clothes were on, I fail to see how that could be a “molestation.” To me, a molestation is a sexual,physical act. Can’t happen with CLOTHES ON. Yes, if clothes were OFF, I would wonder if it is was childhood curiosity or if the other child/children had seen something they shouldn’t have, or even been a victim themselves. I have said that from the beginning. That more info is needed. I think it really depends on the act. I don’t want to get graphic here, but I think anyone can use their imagination and consider what is truly an act and what isn’t.
I am interested to see if any answers will be forthcoming.
a friend of mine was telling me that this whole thing just does not make since and that the school board was informed but there was likely nothing would be or could be done i recieved NO inside information and i am sorry if i made it seem that way but i was simply saying that a friend of mine said it was unlikely that there was truth/ or anything was going to be done about it because it is based on he said she said but basically he said as of now… i never talk to this friend but i decided well lets just ask if they had heard about it i asked around no one gave me anwers as i am sure most people just want answers and they basically said they were aware of the situation but didnt thnk much was going to be done about it… i dont get information about children i dont talk to this person on a regular basis but teachers today will talk about your children to other teachers and to other parents so how about lets not just jump down my throat...Ok? OK
iknowthetruth
i am sorry to tell u but no i dont get info on evry child not even this one but to them it is as simple as this… there is possibly no truth to this!!! THANKS
rmseek1234, I dont think that iknowthetruth was saying a girl was touched. I think what iknow was saying was, would it be any different if it were 3 boys or 2 boys and 1 girl? That if it isnt called “molestation” and is called childhood curiousity when 3 boys are involved, what would it be considered if it were 2 boys and 1 girl. Thats the way I took it anyway..
I still very much disagree with you on “if clothes were on or not”. Could it be possible for one of the boys to have an older sibling or adult and have seen them doing something of this nature? Or having it done to them so they dont see anything wrong with touching other kids. Just to set the record straight; I DO NOT KNOW IF THESE QUESTIONS I HAVE ASKED HAVE ACTUALLY HAPPENED. Just some thoughts on 6 & 7 year olds touching one another.
Mobile police say Kristopher Stewart robbed the Walgreen's on Three Notch Road. But he wasn't looking for drugs. He wanted cash.
more »
Volunteers form a foundation in honor of an 11-year-old Chickasaw boy who was killed when his family's house caught on fire.
more »
The Tarboro, NC couple now faces charges for tying their 13 year old son to a tree for two nights to punish him for being disobedient. Check out the parents' mugshots.
more »
BREAKING NEWS: The Pentagon is expected to announce Wednesday whether the Air Force will rebid a $40 billion contract to build new refueling tankers.
more »
On Day 3 of Putting It In Park, I discovered a neighborhood bus service that comes right to your door!
more »
Congress is one step closer to helping Americans facing foreclosures.
more »
Enlarge Video 
Download Video
Video RSS
Changes At LeFlore High School
News Map
Email to a Friend 
Printer Friendly 
Iknowthetruth,
Not sure what your question means-are you implying that as a parent or grandparent YOU are NOT responsible for your kids. Not sure what that has to do with this thread. But children are the responsibility of those who bring them into this world (or who raise them if the parents are out of the picture). Perhaps if more responsibility was taken to listen to our kids, verbally and non-verbally we would learn alot. Just like with the story that the child had been bullied for four months-get real. If that was the case, there would have been SOME sign! Once again, mad about aide, mad about loss of SSI check, blame it on the school. That of course is only my opinion. But I have yet to see any follow up investigation that PROVES this was a case of “molestation” or anything else, other than someone trying to milk the system-again my opinion.