How do we handle crimes by the courts?
In August, 2007, the Alabama Supreme Court ordered an appeal I filed in the court be dismissed and all the records be stricken from the court.  That included but was not limited to the notice of appeal filed in the Mobile Circuit Court.  The case was originally against State Farm but at this time had become completely covered with criminal acts by court officials they have either admitted or can’t deny. 
The appeal was centered around the fact Herman Thomas had entered a notation on the court record saying he had dismissed the case years ago but there was no order of any kind in the record.  He had never sent us anything saying he had dismissed the case.  When he was removed from office I checked the record and discovered the notation.  I then filed a motion asking whosoever replaced him to remove the notation and grant us the summary judgment that was unopposed for 18 months. 
Edward McDermott took over that case and responded by saying no he was not going to remove that notation.  When McDermott responded I knew he could not possibly remember me to be sitting in a case. To remind him who I was I filed a document with some of our past history.  I filed a motion to recuse him on that basis.  In 1989 in a case between us and Commonwealth National Bank, the president of Commonwealth openly bragged that we could not win because he was paying McDermott for his decisions.  I went to court and asked McDermott to adress the statements the President were making.  He was making these statements out in the open and in front of his lawyers.  McDermott said in open court he would not adress the statement that he was being paid for his decisions. He said however, that he would say that regardless to any facts of law I could bring into the court, all Commonwealth had to do to defeat me was to show up in his court room. 
I had requested a court reporter be present at my expence and was denied.  So I wrote the statements he made and filed them into the court record.  He never denied any part of it.  Then he ordered the Mobile police to start to harrassing me.  I was arrested 53 times by the Mobile police.  Fifty of those times without ever being charged with anything.  The short of this story is that on the last time I saw McDermott I was in court because on mt 50th arrest I told the police I was not going to be arrested without a record again.  They were clearly tired of playing that game by that time.  They called McDermott and told him I refused to be arrested any more without a record and asked him what to do.  They made the call where I could hear both of them.  McDermott told the police to charge me with distrubing the peace.  The officer said he would not do that because I was not doing anything at all.  Then McDermott told him to charge me with Interfearing With Government Operations.  At this trial the Chief Judge ordered McDermott to come from his court room and take the stand and explain why he had me arrested.  The arresting officer testified that I was not doing anythig at the time he arrested me.  The officer said he only arrested me because McDermott told him to.  The Chief Judge asked the officer what was Mr. Lockett doing when you arrested him.  He replied, sitting in the court room.  The Chief Judge then asked, then why did you arrest him?  He said McDermott told us to arrest him everytime we saw him.  When McDermott took the stand he could not put forth any reason why he had had me arrested 53 times.  The Chief Judge ordered the police to stop harrassing me. 
This is only a small part of the evidence that is both undisputed and presented to the Alabama Supreme Court.  Rather that deal with these criminal acts, the Alabama Supreme Court chose to try and hid the fact that they have ever been presented with the information at all.  The Alabama Judiciary have no problems with charging Herman Thomas.  I have no problem with that.  I have personal knowledge that he is a crook.  However when McDermott, a judge that has admitted to being paid for his decisions before Thomas was on the bench is brought before the, Alabama Supreme Court and the same people that is charging Thomas, they stick their head in the sand and try and pretend they never even saw the information. 
In our laws if the court is presented with a crime by a judge and they fail to act they become a party to the crime.  Now that the Alabama Suprem Court has become a party to all the crimes admitted by McDermott where do we go from there as citizens and former citizens of the state of Alabama?  Please forgive my grama.

lawyers and judges have the perfect racket...a money machine...they kinda remind me of that stuff people step in and smells real bad...you know when you have dogs in the yard...that’s what they are

it isn’t only the supreme court that burys it’s head in the sand when confronted with the courts wrong doings..the news media refuses to investigate also..i’ve repeatedly brought up the inequites in the divorce process (alimony) handed out by the circuit court.. and no-one wants to look into it..the out right bias and discrimination towards men in the circuit court system… i have come to the only conclusion i can.. that the circuit court system is flawed beyond repair.. it is irreparable.. our only recourse is to get rid of these little ‘gods’ (judges) that this system propagates and return to a trial by jury..thus eliminating the judges ability to control the outcome..the only reason we have a circuit court system was to save the courts time and money.. supposedly.. what time? the judge is there anyway,everyday..and money? what expense..paying a jury? jurors don’t get paid enough to warrant the injustice of the judge/jury/executioner system that we have now..

When you think you have reached the bottom of the tank in criminal actions by judges you can discover that that is just a recess or resting point on your way to the bottom of the tank of the criminal acts by the court. One of the issues that took us to trial was the IRS claimed that in a two year period we had earned $1,536,000 of income that we did not report. It appears that from the begenning the judge was in on that lie because he refused to allow us to look at any evidence the IRS claimed they had. At trial it became clear that it was all a scam. The IRS had absolutely nothing at all to support that lie. I had filed a motion for a summary judgment before the trial stating they did not have anything to support that lie even though the judge would not make them show me what they had as the law demands. After the trial I filed a second motion the judge refused to rule on either motion.

I have been waiting since May of 2006 for the US Tax Court to grant us a Summary Judgment that even the IRS agreed that we had a right to the thousands upon thousands of dollars they unlawfully took. Can you imagine even the IRS agree that we have a right to have the money returned. I have had 2, two unopposed motions for a Summary Judgment before the court since about May of 2006. One was filed before the May trial and another filed after the trial. In the last motion I stated that the IRS did not win even a single point in the trial and made no claim that they won even one point. The IRS never disputed that claim that was filed in the court. After waiting for over a year and a half for the judge to grant the motion, on January the 22, 2008 the Judge gave a judgment to IRS. To add insult to injury, when I called the court and told the clerk that I was going to appeal the judgment she told me I could not because the judge had also ordered my case closed.

When I explained to her the judge could not close my case two day after he entered the order she sent me to several other clerks that tried to convince me that even though they did not know how he had done this, he had closed my case. Further a document I filed in early January was never posted to the record. The clerk explained that the judge told her not to file the document just mark it as a personal letter to him. I filed a notice of appeal and told them to put the document into the record.

On a secondary issue the IRS had taken some more money from us back in 1999 and had refused to give it back. However in about 2001 they admitted that they had no legal right to take the money but said they needed a judge to enter a order so as to explain why they was giving the money back. They did not object to paying the money back or the fees or even paying damages for not returning the money. The judge said no. No legal reason, just no.

I had almost no respect for the IRS until that point. However I had to raise the IRS off the bottom of the no character, lying, thieving etc barrel and slip the judges in all of the courts under them. The law that we are fighting to give the people in Iraq is not the law we advertise. In stead this is really the criminal acts we are fighting to be able to inflict upon them what is actually being inflicted upon us.