It doesn’t matter if there is insufficient evidence to convict in court. The court of public opinion will not forget the number of complaints lodged against this man and will consider him guilty. He is finished in the judicial world.

claycity as you say Greenough, Doyle and Mims did nothing like this. They were just made examples of (not guilty of anything that anybody else hadn’t done) Thomas will get off because there is not enough evidence (not any reliable sources) nothing but jail bait who will say and do anything to get out!

One of 15 thrown out for some reason.  Heck, Claycity might end up right, if it is already dissolving so quickly.

Oh, she’s dangerous now!  ;-p

Thanks. 

Sounds like this will go on for the rest of the day and into tomorrow.  They still have a slew of potential jurors rounded up in the ceremonial courtroom at GP, so I am told.

Yep, what fly said. 

Both parties can get rid of an unlimited number of jurors based on an actual reason (bias, personal interest, etc).  They can toss some of them just from the questionnaire.  Then they each get to dismiss a specific number of candidates with no reason given.  So they sift through whoever’s left and toss out the ones they think are worst for their case.  Whoever is left makes up the actual jury panel.  All of this is part of the process of “striking the jury.”  So yes, we’re getting closer.

“striking the jury” could have all new definitions in this case but…
otherwise it means the act of eliminating potential jurors from the pool until an adeqate number of individuals acceptable to both sides has been identified. The process will involve questioning jurors about thier answers on the questionare. Some number of those who submitted thier questionares will be eliminated right off the bat based on their answers.

Go to the forums, start to post a message and you will see the word “smiley” at the upper left of the window.  Pick one and it will put the needed text in the box, i.e.  :  gulp : minus the spaces.

Dang it!