Mobile Council Battles Over Budget

Mobile Budget  Council members hope additional funding for the Senior Bowl will convince the game to stay in the Port City.
by Jessica Taloney
Published: Tue, September 22, 2009 - 4:49 pm CST Last Updated: Tue, September 22, 2009 - 5:22 pm CST
MOBILE, Alabama - After nearly four hours of debate and three contentious votes, Mobile's city council finally passed a city budget.

Council Member Connie Hudson amended the Mayor Sam Jones' original proposal to include $115,000 for the Senior Bowl on the condition that the game would agree to stay in Mobile five more years. Hudson's amendment also allocated $85,000 for Saenger Theatre in Downtown Mobile.

"Dangle that carrot and see if they will go with it and give us that long term commitment," said Council President Reggie Copeland, who along with Council Members Gina Gregory and John Williams voted for the Senior Bowl funding.

The line item in the Mayor's proposed budget allocated the money to a sporting investment, but did not say what events would get the cash. Hudson's amendment disappointed supporters of the Gulf Coast Classic who hoped they would be the recipient.

"We've danced around this long enough," said Williams, rejecting the idea of giving the Classic additional funding over the Senior Bowl. "It's time for us to be committed to the number one sports event in this city."

Senior Bowl officials would not say Tuesday whether they would take the money, and agree to the new contract, but Hudson called it a "good faith effort" to show the city's commitment to the game.

Embed:
Email a Friend Email to a Friend   
Printer Friendly Printer Friendly
Download Video   
Translate: » Spanish | French | German | Italian | Japanese | Chinese | Russian | Hindi

One would think all the revenue pouring into the city from The Great Moonpie drop….rise….whatever it was, would more than cover all these sporting events.

Well put Ala.Patriot.  In the Sept 8 Mobile Bay Times, they quoted the mayor as saying that it was fundamentally unfair for city residents to subsidize those who live outside the city and receive full city services without paying the same taxes. This was in response to the Ala.Sup.Ct decision in the Dickson Camper lawsuit. Maybe they forget that those in the 3 mile police jurisdiction pay 2% sales tax which goes to the city to cover the expense of police and fire. Those in unincorporated areas, pay their fair share of taxes.  Other than police/fire, what full city services are offered in the PJ - trash and garbage are not collected in the PJ, except right before a vote on annexation!  Maybe they should work on keeping businesses and the Senior Bowl, instead of additional land grab.  Some blame the small towns around Bham as the cause of its problems and preventing Bham from growing, maybe they need to look at it from another direction, if there were no small towns surrounding Bham, then those residents would not only leave Bham but also the whole area.

The city leaders should be looking inside of the city limits for more revenue instead of trying the easy way out and roping in unwilling and potentially hostile citizens that have already seen how utterly unscrupulously and unfairly that the mayor handled the past two annexations.  No one wants increased taxes, more rules and regulations, and to have absolutely no sayso in their choice of entering the city or not.  The city has various ways of raising more capital within the city, and they should be looking at those opportunities very closely.  The city has absolutely nothing to offer the citizens residing in the unincorporated areas of Mobile County that they don’t already have.  All the annexation would be is a land grab and forcing the people to pay higher taxes and face criminal charges if they shot fireworks, burnt their trash, or target shoot in their own yards.  Many people read these posts and comment on them both at work and at home, as well as at church, the stores, and the schools.  Everybody is aware of the mayor’s (and hence the city council’s) unethical methods of obtaining biased votes from people that will not be affected financially (if at all) because they are already receiving government housing, food stamps, and various other freebies that everyone else has to dig and scrape up money for.  The people in the county know this now, and will try their best to block any further annexations if they can.  Mobile is losing the trust of the people rapidly. JMO

Recently Commented On

Siran Stacy Sues Dothan 911…

5 Total Comments
Siran Stacy Sues Dothan 911 Board After Fatal Wreck Former University of Alabama football player Siran Stacy… more »

Baldwin School Closing A Possibility?

4 Total Comments
Baldwin School Closing A Possibility? Baldwin County Board of Education says more layoffs, school… more »

WKRG Digital Signal Upgrade

1 Total Comments
WKRG Digital Signal Upgrade WKRG digital signal upgrades affect some reception for those… more »

Deadly Ship Explosion

1 Total Comments
Deadly Ship Explosion One person is dead, another believed to be dead following… more »

Gulf Coast Classic Attendance:…

10 Total Comments
Gulf Coast Classic Attendance: 8,495 The city of Mobile put up more than $70,000 for the 2009… more »