Herman Thomas Defense Team Begins

Alabama Mobile Judge dismisses 21 charges in the case against former Circuit Court Judge Herman Thomas. The defense begins calling witnesses.

by Jessica Taloney

Published: Tue, October 20, 2009 - 12:17 pm CST Last Updated: Tue, October 20, 2009 - 8:15 pm CST

MOBILE, Alabama - When former Circuit Court Judge Herman Thomas' attorneys begins calling witnesses Tuesday afternoon, there were 21 fewer charges to defend against.

Tuesday morning, Judge Claud Neilson dismissed three entire cases after prosecutors announced they would not call any witnesses or produce any evidence in the cases. Chief Assistant District Attorney Nicki Patterson told reporters one of the accusers was "missing," and the remaining two would only testify about more whipping and not sexual abuse. Patterson said after eight days of testimony if jurors don't believe Thomas whipped the accusers, "two more accusers won't make a difference."

Neilson also dismissed the only two remaining ethics charges, saying based on testimony during the trial he believed the violations occurred outside the four year statute of limitations. The judge also reduced one of
the sodomy charges to attempted sodomy.

The prosecution rested it's case after Neilson decided not to allow testimony from a psychologist who specializes in sex abuse and sexual fetishes. Former District Attorney Chris Galanos, who is working with Thomas' defense team, argued the testimony should not be allowed because the doctor had not examined any of the accusers or the defendant. Neilson agreed.

Jurors, who were dismissed from the courtroom while attorneys argued over the charges and the doctor's testimony, will return at 2 p.m. when defense attorney Jeff Deen calls the defense's first witness.

Thomas faces 52 felony charges involving eleven alleged victims.

WKRG.com » News Stream » Alabama

Video
Photo

Embed:

WKRG.com Related

more –› News Topic: Herman Thomas

News –› Alabama

News –› Mobile

Discuss this in the forum

Email to a Friend

Printer Friendly

Download Video

BamaBob Says:

Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:40 am

My opinion of all this has changed over the past couple of days. I thought the prosecution had a smoking gun or something that would bolster and solidify their case. It has just been a list of unverifiable claims by unscrupulous repeat offenders.

Thomas definitely crossed several lines and should never be a judge again, but beyond that I’m just not sure.

One thing I would love to know just out of curiosity is how he treated others that came in front of his bench. Did Caucasians, Hispanics and Asians get a fair shake before this guy, or did he throw the book at them? Someone should take a hard look at every case the guy ruled on.

flyonthewall Says:

Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:34 am

Note to self - remind defense attorney not to call Catholic Archbishop as character witness in sex scandal case involving men in positions of power taking advantage of the weak