News being bias? No way, can’t be. That is like saying the schools are bias to the liberal cause, and we all know that’s not true.  Just look at what these dumocates are saying. They are stupid anyway you look at it.  Stupid because they think you don’t know they are telling a bold face lie or they really don’t know anything about what they are doing.  Question to a Dem. Senator about health care bill; will it raise taxes or raise the national debt? Dem. Senator “no”. Congress woman from CA. “ we need to have health care like Cuba. Cuba is a wonderful system we could learn a lot from them” THE Obamanation will have this country and health care running like Prichard in no time.

I was there and this is bias reporting in my opinion.  Those comments for health care were extremely rare and channel 5 picked those out purposely to air for their newscast.  There might have been 3 or 4 comments in a 2 hour town hall where MOST everyone was against Govt. Controlled Health Care.  Afterwards the newsreporter made a b-line for those who said they were for Health Care.

wait for me; interesting response i will ge back to you after i feed the herd. (Only three dogs, not a literal herd.you have a lot of good ideas

Clay, what you are saying is partially true.  We contribute to Medicare, but we will never get to see true benefit from it because if the current plans for reform pass they WILL cut at least 500 billion dollars from Medicare, this is true and what Obama said himself, no spin.  So by the time I and most are of age to benefit from our contributions it will be useless and we will be left with “End of Life Panels” and long waits for any type of medical treatment.  As for social security all of us that work also contribute to this, but we will never see any benefit from it either. What do these two programs have in common; both are government run programs, so to see our healthcare taken over by an inept government that can’t properly run cash for clunkers would be a big mistake by ALL Americans.  We as Americans need torte reform and for our government to relax the current laws allowing insurance companies from other states to compete, that would bring the cost down allowing more to be insured.  Adding a government option would mainly benefit those that are already to lazy to work to pay for their own insurance and those like you that are owners of small businesses so you can drop your employee plan and let them enjoy the fruits of my labor by getting on the governments teet.

no one said the government option is out, its only the minority who cant effect it anyway,the party of no. oh and by the way, you didint pay for medicare friends, you contributed towards theose collecting while you were working and i am doing the same for you now. saem with that social security your drawing. difference is when i try and collect it wont be there and because we had fewer children there will be less people to support a larger qaging population. but your hoping i dont notice that jeff. here you are a senator preaching the same misonformation limbaugh is preaching.

“Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”
-Ronald Reagan

The writer posts the question, but what were the answeres.Just my opinion,but Have you been to the dmv or maybe some other government run agency? They make a mess of everything they touch. So why would you let them control your health care?

The author of this piece states first that “This comes on a night when folks packed the University of South Alabama Mitchell Center…”

The next sentence states “Thursday evening, more than 200 people attended the public health care listening forum at the Mitchell Center.”

I have been to the Mitchell Center and I believe it would take considerably more than 200 people to pack the venue.

Just a thought.